The dossier will be submitted in Interfolio. ![]() If the department does not wish to reconsider the case, then it should return the dossier to the Committee with an explanation of that fact. Signatures of those faculty members voting or abstaining shall appear on the letter of reconsideration. Letters of departmental reconsideration should indicate the number of faculty supporting the recommendation, the number opposing, and the number abstaining (or unable to vote for reasons of absence, etc.). Reconsideration by the department requires that a new vote be taken among the appropriate members following the voting procedure followed for the initial consideration. If so, the department shall have one week to respond in writing to the Committee’s opinions. The appropriate departmental faculty members must meet to decide whether they wish to reconsider their decision on the case. In all evaluations, if the P&T Committee recommendation counters the departmental majority recommendation, the P&T Committee shall return the case to the department for reconsideration with a written enumeration of specific reservations or differences of opinion regarding the merits of the case. The departmental letter should specify the context in which this information was obtained.įor joint appointments, each department in which the candidate has an appointment will review the candidate and provide a letter of nomination in accordance with this procedure. The Department may seek additional information from collaborators of the candidate. In cases of promotion to Senior Professor of Practice, the letter should address teaching and service. If a candidate is proposed for early tenure, the reasons for this should be discussed in the letter. In third year review cases, the letter should address scholarship and teaching, and it may discuss service. In cases of promotion and/or tenure, the letter from the department should highlight the candidate’s achievements in each of the following areas: scholarship, teaching, and service. The original letter shall be submitted to the dean and is due with the candidate’s full dossier. The letter of nomination shall state, above the signatures, that the signers have read the letter and agree with the vote tabulation. Signatures of those faculty members voting or abstaining shall appear on the letter of nomination. Absentee and mail-in votes are not allowed. Departmental voting shall be by secret ballot, or by open (voice) ballot if no voting member objects.Ī letter of nomination from the department shall contain a summary of the discussion, including the reasons for any negative vote(s) and shall indicate the number of faculty supporting the recommendation, the number opposing, and the number abstaining (or unable to vote for reasons of absence, etc.). However untenured faculty members may not vote on actions that involve the awarding of tenure. The Role of the DepartmentĪll SSE department members with regular appointments at or above the rank for which a candidate is being considered are eligible to vote on the review cases in that department. In the case of promotion to Senior Professor of Practice, the dean will also include the recommendation of the Professor of Practice Promotion Advisory Committee. Following the review and vote of the Committee, the dean will forward the committee’s decision, his/her own comments and recommendation, the department’s letter of nomination, and the dossier to the provost for a final decision on the case. It is the obligation of the department to ensure that a candidate’s dossier is complete. The P&T Committee acts on cases forwarded to it by the department in which the candidate’s appointment resides. The Dean of the School of Science and Engineering is not a member of the committee, but provides the provost with independent recommendations on cases decided by the committee. The Committee and its composition are described in the SSE Constitution. The Committee also acts on the recommendations of the Professor of Practice Advisory Committee on promotions to the rank of Senior Professor of Practice. The School of Science and Engineering (SSE) Promotion and Tenure (P&T) Committee represents the SSE faculty in matters of evaluation of cases of Third Year Review, promotion to the rank of Associate Professor or Professor, and tenure. The Role of the Promotion and Tenure Committeeįaculty status, including the granting of tenure, is primarily a faculty responsibility. ![]() ![]() Promotion and Tenure Committee Guidelines for Promotion to Senior Professor of Practice, Third-Year Review, Promotion to Associate Professor with Tenure, and Promotion to Full ProfessorĪmended JA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |